THERE have been lengthy debates over the old school curriculum versus the K to 12 system, which involves a range of factors, from economic to cultural. Advocates of the old curriculum argue that it is more applicable and beneficial in certain contexts, and this preference is fueled by several underlying reasons.

The old curriculum, consisting of six years of elementary education (or seven for some private schools) and four years of high school, had been in place for many decades. This long-standing system is deeply embedded in the culture and mindset of Filipinos, long enough to provide a sense of stability and predictability to students, parents and educators. The familiarity with the old system means fewer growing pains in terms of adaptation, both from an instructional and a logistical perspective.