FOR the second time, the Supreme Court (SC) has ordered Public Attorney's Office (PAO) Chief Persida Rueda Acosta to show cause why she should not be disciplined as a member of the Bar over the issuance of an office order which the Court deemed as "belligerent and disrespectful."
The controversial order, PAO Office Order 096, Series of 2023, was issued by Acosta in response to the Court's resolution, dated July 11, 2023, directing the PAO to strictly comply with Canon III, Section 22 of the Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (CPRa).
Already have an active account? Log in here.
Continue reading with one of these options:
Continue reading with one of these options:
Premium + Digital Edition
Ad-free access
P 80 per month
(billed annually at P 960)
- Unlimited ad-free access to website articles
- Limited offer: Subscribe today and get digital edition access for free (accessible with up to 3 devices)
TRY FREE FOR 14 DAYS
See details
See details
If you have an active account, log in
here
.