What I think should be amended

May 01, 2023 12:08 am

THE partisans of Charter change frequently mention the 'restrictive economic provisions' that they believe should be allowed more slack. It is maintained, with good reason, that many projects that would be beneficial to the nation are capital-intensive. We need investors — but the constitutional restrictions currently in place keep them at bay.

I will, however, take up the provisions that must be addressed if amendments to the Constitution are to be introduced at all.

Already have an active account? Log in here to continue reading.
Or
Subscribe to the Premium Subscription plan to access this subscriber-exclusive article.

Related Articles

Romualdez using Binay template, but will prove to be useless

Culpable violation of the Constitution

Has Sara committed a crime?

Trumping down the dollar?

An assessment of the Beijing P2P

The stupidest batch of senators at a critical time for policy expertise

An anti-political dynasty workaround