Dear PAO,
Without a search warrant, police authorities barged into our house and arrested my husband, based solely on alleged intelligence information that he possessed a loose firearm. Cowed by the cavalier presence of police officers, my husband pointed out the location of his firearm. The defense counsel of my husband challenged the legality of his arrest and alleged that the seized firearm could not be presented in evidence, it being covered by the “exclusionary rule.” Please enlighten me about the concept and purposes of this rule.
Already have an active account? Log in here.
Continue reading with one of these options:
Continue reading with one of these options:
Premium + Digital Edition
Ad-free access
P 80 per month
(billed annually at P 960)
- Unlimited ad-free access to website articles
- Limited offer: Subscribe today and get digital edition access for free (accessible with up to 3 devices)
TRY FREE FOR 14 DAYS
See details
See details
If you have an active account, log in
here
.