THIS may disappoint some of my readers, or lead others to wonder whether I have abandoned constitutional principles.
But in the interest of fairness and objectivity, I feel duty-bound to state that I do not believe the Supreme Court’s decision on the Disbursement Acceleration Program (DAP) is the absolutely final word on the subject, even though I have hailed it as a landmark ruling and a possible “tipping point” in national politics and governance.
Already have an active account? Log in here.
Continue reading with one of these options:
Continue reading with one of these options:
Premium + Digital Edition
Ad-free access
P 80 per month
(billed annually at P 960)
- Unlimited ad-free access to website articles
- Limited offer: Subscribe today and get digital edition access for free (accessible with up to 3 devices)
TRY FREE FOR 14 DAYS
See details
See details
If you have an active account, log in
here
.